Sunday, March 18, 2012

Reflection 2


After mat time, one child picked up a magnetic resource that had fallen on the ground. The child played with it by putting it on a whiteboard and taking it off again. When I observed the child, I thought about the use of the whiteboard in my centre. My home centre provides magnetic blocks for the children’s own play.
However, the teachers did not facilitate the use of the whiteboard. Usually teachers use the whiteboard for mat time. Teachers have given the children a couple of opportunities to use marker pens on the whiteboard during mat time. Presumably the teachers think that the whiteboard should be for mat time. If the children start playing with the whiteboard during free time, they may think they can play with it all the time and mat time may be disturbed.
In my opinion, the whiteboard should be used in various ways for children’s technological learning while interacting with them. If the whiteboard in my centre was an interactive whiteboard, it would be more useful for the children’s learning. Unluckily, it is just a whiteboard, so I would like to discover new ideas linked with technology for the children’s learning and my teaching about it.
Te Whāriki emphasises that children have a right to explore technology resources, such as magnets (Ministry of Education, 1996). O’Hara (2004) insists that without interaction with people, technology learning or progress does not occur.
Thus, I believe that not only whiteboards but also accompanied resources, including magnetic pictures or photos and marker pens should be provided together. With those technological tools, I can communicate with the children by asking how it works, suggesting manipulation and experimenting. Moreover, I should respond to children’s activities linked with ICT by communicating with children so that they can learn and understand the use and progress of technology.
New Zealand Curriculum declares that stage props can be used as part of technology teaching. Those can be connected with information and communication technology (Ministry of Education, 2007). Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford (2006) assert that teachers should continually ask questions to children by using “what if…?” so that they identify technological functions hidden in applications; experiment potential possibility and solve problems.
The children in my centre can explore the role of magnet on the whiteboard while comparing what happens when things are magnetic and when they are not. This ensures that the teaching moment of magnetic technology is smoothly continued through communication with the children.
Alexander (2004, as cited in Siraj-Blatchford & Siraj-Blatchford, 2006) also emphasises on teachers’ technology teaching strategies. Discussion and seeking for answers through scaffolding are important for children to develop potential cognition. Wood (1998, as cited in O’Hara, 2004) states that children’s thinking is further widened and children meet a challenge when teachers support their learning through scaffolding during their play and hands-on exploration.
Through this, I could have an idea about how to use the whiteboard for teaching technology. I could set up a table for making props of the children’s favourite stories. One of the materials would include magnets for sticking on a whiteboard. During the activity, I can talk about the functions of the craft tools, such as scissors and the use of technology. 

After making the props, I would encourage them to share the story with their friends by using the whiteboard. In the meantime, if they do not have any props, they can use drawings they have made with marker pens for their favourite stories. 

Then, I encourage them to think about convenience and inconvenience when using and not using technology. In addition, when the children share their story, I or the children can record the story a friend tells with a digital camera. Then, we can explore the process of how recorded video gets from the camera to the computer and how we can watch it.


Reference lists
Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1-13. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

O’Hara, M. (2004). ICT in the early years. New York, NY: Continuum.

Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2006). A guide to developing the ICT curriculum for early childhood education. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books.


Reference lists of photos

3 comments:

  1. Yes I agree that children have the right to use technology in the centre, may be the there needs to be a separate white board for drawing on- I know it is hard to use the board at mat time if there is drawing and writing all over it.
    Children learn by doing, interactive technology is a great way of doing that.
    Magnets - apart of science and science and technology can be used together to promote learning- perhaps computers or other technology can be used to extend the learning occuring with magnets, drawing and the interactive whiteboard.
    Talay-Ongan (2005) suggests that perhaps the smartboard - 'the computer linked electronic blackboard' can be used to facilitate group discussion and integrates use of software. Technology is used to support and scaffold student interaction, (p.227).
    Encouraging children to create their own stories and magnets is a great idea- perhaps using magnetic stories at mat time to continue the use of magnets for communication.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right, we are living with and benefit from technology in our surroundings. In addition, there are lots of technological resources such as magnetic resources, marker pens and whiteboards in the early childhood settings. Sadly, I also have seen that some teachers use a whiteboard for only teachers’ teaching during mat-time. I agree that a whiteboard can be used for children to improve technological learning in many ways. Teachers can provide whiteboards with magnetic alphabet letters or many kinds of shapes papers and magnets. In addition, children can freely draw with coloured markers on the whiteboard as well as erase their drawing easily.

    Isenberg and Jalongo (2006) suggest that strategy and memory games and more-complex board and card games support children to develop skills and concepts through problem solving in their surroundings. In addition, children can develop the confidence to choose and experiment with materials through exploration with fun during their play (Ministry of Education, 1996).

    References
    Isenberg, J. P., & Jalongo, M. R. (2006). Creative thinking and arts-based learning: Preschool through fourth grade (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa : Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reflection 3 http://hyunseo-technoworld.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/reflection-3.html
    Hyun‘s example are quite common for the learning centres. I like her proposal of solving technological learning experience with the children. The visit to the centre office, small excursion inside the centre and further exploration starting from the paper technology following by office equipment connection with everyday practice is good and it is possible for everyone. There is a good thinking in the process of organisation, but she didn’t express any joy in her planning for her or for children. In my opinion it should be organised like good invention combining with current children interests through play “by doing, asking questions, how things work… by purposeful use of resources” (p.82). In my centre I will play with children “the pirate treasure hunting”. I will offer to find the equipment and explain to other children what this equipment for. Our children learn through play “very important for children’s development… in later life” (Claiborne & Drewery, 2010, p.160) and “the equipment should be provided … for technological learning” (Ministry of Education, 1996, p.83). (156)

    ReplyDelete